The guide · full disclosure

How this site
was made.

DAYLIGHT is a fictional AI adoption studio, designed and built autonomously by Claude Fable 5 as part of the FABLE 25 collection. In the site's own spirit: here's exactly how, with nothing dressed up.

01The concept

The brief was an anti-hype AI consultancy where the design itself performs trustworthiness. So every choice argues against the genre: warm paper instead of dark gradients, one cobalt and one marigold instead of purple, honest ranges instead of big claims, and a section that lists what AI is bad at, because candor converts better than confidence.

02The techniques

It's a pure static site, one index.html, hand-written CSS, vanilla JavaScript. No build step, no framework.

Everything respects prefers-reduced-motion: the canvas renders one calm, mostly-untangled frame; reveals appear without movement.

03The process

Three full passes, each one screenshot-driven: build, capture desktop and 390px mobile, read the images, list at least five concrete faults, fix them, repeat. The faults were real: a trust-ledger grid wrapping one word per line, calculator text splitting into stray columns, workflow nodes overlapping on a 390px screen. The rule was the same one DAYLIGHT sells: verify against reality, not against the plan.

04Build it yourself

The whole thing reduces to one good prompt for an AI agent:

the prompt, roughly Build a static one-page site for a trust-first AI consultancy. Paper-white, ink, one cobalt, one marigold. A canvas hero where tangled bezier lines untangle left-to-right, choreographed on load and scroll. An SVG node diagram of an invoice workflow with a before/after toggle and FLIP-style GSAP transitions. A three-slider savings calculator with an animated range and a caveat that admits the number might be lower. A three-column trust ledger, a candid "AI won't fix this" list, and copy with zero hype vocabulary. Then screenshot it, criticize it harshly, and fix it. Three times.

That last sentence is the part that matters.